CLOUD 500 said:
Many people left the province due to the enforcement of the French language on people.
You are right about that. But it was by far mostly English speaking Canadians, according to Statistic Canada (definitely my preferred reading lol).
In the same time, many French speaking Canadians came to Québec (dixit Statistic Canada).
All in all, the net flow was about neutral.
(I should enroll into MythBuster ).
CLOUD 500 said:
The First Nations people are not enforcing their language and culture on everyone living in this province. They are not forcing businesses to operate in their language.
And how would they do that ?
Both French and English colonizer made sure that they could never do that.
Now, in the case of Quebecers, we do have the means and the will.
And this comes from historical facts, where the English power did not have any choice to grant French Canadians some rights and power to protect its language, religion and culture.
All that, while having definite plans to assimilate the French culture (if you recall).
CLOUD 500 said:
Federalists are not promoting enforcing on their language on other people nor are they trying to assimilate other cultures into their own.
That’s a load of crap and is very hypocritical.
English language and culture is imposed on everyone, elsewhere in Canada, by default.
CLOUD 500 said:
People should have the right to choose the language for their school to attend to.
I don’t see much Chinese, Italian, Arab and Polish (the list goes on), nor even French schools or government services in any parts of the country.
Can Chinese or any of the above mentioned minorities work in their own language in Canada ?
Can Polish get medical treatments in their own language ?
Can Arabs have many wives in Canada ?
Isn’t this last case imposed by law…and by the dominant religion ?
CLOUD 500 said:
They used the Notwithstanding Clause to create Bill 101. They are making a huge exception for Quebec to ensure the dominance of the French language even though it goes against democracy and freedom of speech.
…
Just the fact that they are enforcing the French language is enough to prove that. They used the "Notwithstanding Clause" to setup Bill 101 even though it override freedom of expression and freedom of equality. This goes against the Human Charter of rights and democracy.
Of course we are and we did not have any choice.
The English language is the de facto language in Canada and it does not need protection.
Giving a right in the Charter is fine, but this right is a general rule.
The main problem is the implementation of that right, which is very complex and mostly unfair mechanism.
How do you respect a right for a portion of a society, if doing so goes against some rights of another portion of that same society ?
Whatever you do will be unfair to some…but that is democracy…the tyranny of the majority.
In the case of Québec, it was the Notwithstanding Clause and Bill 101.
Yes, it may be seen as unfair…but it is much less hypocritical, don’t you think ?