There was zero debate at whom would get picked #1 that year. Zero.
Not true/Revisionist history. I watched that draft and they to spoke to various ESPN experts who had different opinions on it and argued about it. There was vivid and robust debate. Laine was coming off being voted MVP of the World Championships at that time. Matthews had not accomplished as much internationally. Sports Illustrated's 2016 Draft preview alluded to the debate:
2. Patrik Laine, Tappara Tampere (Finland)
As good as Matthews is, there are scouts who believe Laine could end up being the better player. “He's like a faster version of Brett Hull,” offered one scout. “He gets the puck off his stick almost before you realize he has it.” That innate scoring touch helped Laine earn MVP honors in the Finnish playoffs and at the World Championship, a remarkable achievement for any player, let alone a draft-eligible one. "He wants to be a difference-maker every time he's on the ice," another scout said. "He's got that drive that allows him to make the most of his tools." The expectation is that he'll showcase that drive next season in the NHL.
Scouts say there's plenty of talented forwards behind Auston Matthews in the 2016 NHL Draft. Here are the best.
www.si.com
As both players embark on the second part of their careers, some people still believe that Laine, if he could stay healthy, will have a better second half of his career than Matthews will. If so Laine would be making good on the prediction of the scouts SI spoke to back in 2016.