Oh man , that is enlightening. Fuckkk , I cant believe it !!!! 95%? Man I thought Montreal had good people and family values.
The Bitching thread
- Thread starter AirBo
- Start date
You can only have empathy , if you heal from that damage or at least have intentions of getting better. if you are damaged and doing this , you are just going to pass on the trauma to your clients and people you come in contact with.
Also these men are what I feel is wrong with the world . Imagine the lies they tell to their wives, imagine the amount of intimacy they miss with the person that they are supposed to have it with so that they can raise their children well. But no , we are men , we just want to fuck everything up and make the world hell. Kudos to all those married men reading this forum
That could just be your opinion, why do you think that your opinion is a universal fact?
Last edited:
I am relatively new here. I don't care about people getting married cause in my opinion they should not .We age, men and women. It’s not supposed to work for except to make kids. Anything is fine if you ate aware of your actions and making sure that you are not fucking up the progeny , but these men probably might not be enlightened enough to not do that. But TBH , I have been to many places in the world , Montreal is the only place where I would pursue this hobby , cause the way the people are raised here I really like it . I really feel positive among them . I hope these people are not assholes to the girls and in personal life , but at any other place it would be wors.
Someone who has experienced emotional, psychological, or physical harm that has had a lasting impact on their well-being.
Abused (mostly) whether physically or psychologically.
Sometimes the total opposite: ignored.
I've come to realize, with time, that it's incredible the percentage of women who have gone through some kind of abuse when they were younger.
I do not think my opinion is universal but it is my observation from my experience. Also, I made sure to add the word "usually".
You better get used to my style of posting
It is impossible for anyone to grow up without facing any one of these issues so in reality everyone is damaged to some extent, it is just that some people just don’t want to accept. These are the ones that continue living their life following the same patterns and then passing on the trauma to others. Also when people realize this they are termed as “woke” and “snowflakes” by the abusers cause then how else will their reign of terror, delusion and control sustain?
Everyone has problems, but some people have good support networks that either help them bounce back readily, so traumas don't hit them quite as hard when they do hit, or they're resilient people who have managed to navigate their issues and have developed lives for themselves where they don't worry so much about those traumas.
You know, I mostly agree with what you're saying and I understand why my post made you react this way.
Try to see beyond the provocation. If you take most of my posts at face value, you won't like me very much.
Whether you have recovered or not, it still leaves “scars” on your body and mind. Life is hard, pretty much everyone has had at the very least one life changing event that can leave trauma, visible or not.
I also don’t like the term “damaged”, you are not a damaged merchandise that we put in the discount bin.
It’s good for everyone, stop seeing yourself as damaged and stop seeing others as damaged.
Oh not at all man , I feel they are good pointers for starting conversation about something real I am no one to judge on the basis of just one of your post. If anything else I probably I will like you if i met you irl.
Yes I think what was wrong with phrasing was using the word “damaged” cause it actually feels objectifying.
For me right now , I have started seeing everyone as “fragile” not “damaged” . Don’t know what is the best way, but this is how I relate with others right now.
I absolutely love “fragile” as you should always treat others with care and realize that they can “break”. It might sound objectifying but sometimes those exemples are the easiest to understand and relate to.
Not really the same, married couples have a very different protection according to law. One major difference is about the wealth gains during marriage whereas everything, retirement plans, investments, capital, material etc. falls into the family heritage which, following a divorce, will have to be split between the two. And very often, the wife will be compensated for her years spent raising kids and holding the house without being able to pursue a career. None of this exists if you live in a common law relationship.
If you have kids there will still be alimony to be paid, depending on income and who has the most of the custody.
Just a little precision.
Similar threads
