rumpleforeskiin said:
Just like any other player, a slugger's most important stat is his OPS.
It may be to Sabermetricians like you, Rumples, but I do not agree. OPS has come into baseball jargon due to Sabermetric theory. I do not accept all of the tenets of Sabermetric theory. To me some of it is rational and useful, but some of it isn't. Many critics of Sabermetric theory have pointed out that slugging percentage is more valid for testing the productivity of power hitters and OBP for testing the productivity all other hitters.
I have read the Sabermetric bible, "Moneyball." In that book, the child prodigy of Sabermetrician theorists was none other than current Yankee Nick Swisher, he of the high OBP and OPS, he who led the American league in pitch count per at bat. Now that I see Swisher play every day with the Yankees, let me tell you about some of the flaws of Sabermetric theory. Number 1, Swisher strikes out way too much. You may recall the Red Sox picked up another Sabermetrician's dream a few years ago - Mark Bellhorn, who proceeded to lead the AL in strikeouts with 175 while only hitting about 17 homers. While such stats may be acceptable for a lower third of the batting order hitter, it's unacceptable for someone who hits 5 or 6 in the lineup and is coming up with men on base. Swisher can face 20 pitches in an at bat, then strike out with bases loaded and 1 out. The Sabermetricians will come in their pants; meanwhile the fan watching this spectacle sees yet another rally get killed. Number 2, Swisher is weak defensively and slow running the bases. He is a platoon player at best with most major league teams, and will hopefully again be reduced to that role when the Yankees get Nady back. Nady is a much better player than Swisher is.
Sabermetricians overlook the value of making contact in baseball. Guys like Bellhorn and Swisher could never play for me, if I managed in MLB. I like guys who can make contact, hit the opposite way, move runners, sacrifice and do not consistently strike out in critical situations.
In addition, if OPS is the best stat to evaluate a hitter, then it follows that OPS allowed must be the best stat to evaluate pitchers. However, if we did that, we would have to remove Nolan Ryan from the Hall of Fame, as his OPS allowed is one of the worst ever. I will leave it to Rumples to call up Nolan and tell him that due to Sabermetric theory, he is being removed from the Hall of Fame. Here is what Ryan would likely do with Rumples:
https://www.ecoupons.com/show_image...sedge.com/Images/Product/33-63/33-63523-F.jpg
Video:
http://ballhype.com/video/nolan_ryan_vs_robin_ventura_1993/ (ranked #1 pitcher retaliation of all time by ESPN)
For these and other reasons, I reject the unbridled and unmodified adoption of Sabermetric theory in evaluating players. I say to Sabermetricians, watch what these players do in evaluating them. See whether they make contact after running all those deep counts. If they don't, the stats mean shit.