excellent perspective Doc. indeed. Cheating is also a 2way street, and dont cheaters, especially admitted cheaters deserve a second chance???? for example the person who cheated on their taxes, on a exam or worse, on their spouse? are they doomed for life or should they be allowed another chance? Anyways, i believe we will one day see Arod in the Hall of Fame, and deservedly so, he made a mistake, confessed, and moved on. just like is done most of the time with my 3 examples above, it takes time for forgiveness, and Arod has years left to be forgiven and looked at in a good light.
Cheaters? MLB knew full well that many 'stars' in the 90's & early 200s were juicing themselves. But MLB looked the other way since their two biggest stars at one point, McGwire & Sosa, were saving baseball with their race to the homerun record. MLB didn't care that the likes of Ken Camminety, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire & hundreds of other players were on steroids & HGH. All it cared about was the profits coming in & the fact fans were returning to the ballpark after the 1994 cancelled season. That's why it only began to test players in 2003....not because it really wanted to, but because of pressure from Congress & baseball fans in general.
So my point is....if MLB didn't take steroids & HGH seriously, why is it considered 'cheating' by those same players whom MLB put on a pedestal at the time?
Where do you draw the line when it comes to 'cheating'? Shouldn't corrective eye surgery be considered 'cheating'? What about players playing on Red Bull? Wouldn't that be considered 'cheating' also? What about players who play for teams offering better training regimen & exercise equipment? Wouldn't this edge they have over other teams be considered 'cheating'? I could go on & on.