It is interesting that this discussion has gone down the following road. For in the contributions of these posters whom I have quoted below, lies the key to a question most often debated and most often without solution: It is the issue of when GFE is advertised for an escort on a website it is YMMV for one client and GFE for the next even though both clients pay the same dollar and expect GFE as we understand it to be:
Girlfriend Experience (GFE) defined as what one might reasonably expect to receive from a girlfriend including CONNECTION (the feeling that you are not alone in the room), LFK/DFK, , DATY and DIGITS .
Basically, women want to control men with zero personal investment, and maximum return, it`s a natural imperative.
But they do not want to need for anything. They need security without a penis clause ====> $$$$
Solution: vagina auction.
It goes back to female psychology. A woman can get laid anytime she wants. Ever since she was 14, her world is essential a 24/7 drive thru of cock. Every man she has met since that time has been trying to get in her pants. The idea that someone can`t get laid is alien to them. It is sub-human. Someone desperately trying to get laid smacks of neediness and lameness to them.
Kind of increases the bargaining power on her side doesn`t it? Now she can deliver less for more. Indeed, on an instinctive level, feel a lack of value in the object of her service
(i.e. Loser).
I remember one time a SP told me that if she ever went to see a customer and when he opened the door he looked like Colin Farrell(example she used) that she simply would not charge him, I will always remember this comment that was said to me by the SP.
There are various forms of currency not just dollars. Women do enjoy sex, but, like men, primarily on their terms. If you check out the following link this is spelled out precisely in the first post of the thread:
https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?67308-Chronicle-from-the-Other-Side-of-the-Mirror-Those-Who-Seek-Love-with-an-Escorts.
Since prehistoric times women have developed their own form of currency. Dollars are just another form of satisfying wants and needs (i.e. protection, resources etc.) Indeed it has become an unconscious process of evaluating the worth of males.
Now this whole argument as I have laid it out is the underlying or root issue often associated with reviews on review boards, The issue of YMMV and when GFE is advertised, is it realistic to think it will not be related to what has been discussed above?
So how do we define loser in this context? It is precisely a major part or all of the above.
One of the most impressive examples of this is the school of “fast seduction” (alt.fastseduction.com) most often identified with its chief guru who goes by the pseudonym “Mystery.” The entire philosophy of this school of thought is to methodically identify those qualities associated with how women rate the average male in relation to themselves and internalize those qualities which are deemed to create the ideal personal image. Is it an outward sham? Of course! Women aren`t stupid. Eventually their astuteness kicks in. It is only meant to provide the means necessary to get her into the sack. If more comes of it, then so much the better.
So, in all of the banter in all of the threads with escorts, there are a couple of questions:
Are there escorts who for one reason or another are
more able than others to provide a greater number of true GFE encounters? (And this means consistently notwithstanding the lateness of the hour or other temporary physical interventions).
If so, what are those qualities which go into making such an escort as opposed to escorts
who instinctively evaluate a clients worth (i.e. loser or not) using the yardstick described above, who provide YMMV service on every occasion (though they are classed as full GFE)?