Techman said:
You aren't talking about the hobby. You're talking about your own little comments and suspicions that the mods here won't allow you to post without anything to back them up!
TM.
With all due respect, most of us hobbyists can tell when a girl is stoned off her tree.
So when we post that a girl "acted high," that vague comment is intended to both:
(1) Warn hobbyists that there may be an issue.
(2) Keep enough generality so the girl's reputation isn't unduly damaged. (I mean anyone can act stoned. I act stoned sometimes....)
****
I'll take it one step further, when I made the comment that a girl "acted high" - what I really mean is "she was stoned off her tree...to the point that it was obvious."
I would never have posted my hint aout this girl if I wasnt
sure.
But you, (and your pal MOD 8) would prefer that if an SP goes to a meeting shit-faced...that everything be kept under wraps....that we talk to the agency about it....that nothing come out in public.
Well then...what is the purpose of a review board...?
I thought it was to inform other members or good or bad service.
****
But once again. This isn't about me.
I mean if it was just my credibility ... fine....Mods can ban me, do what they want...
But it goes beyond that.
They know that I am bang on....
They just ban and delete any candid thread about advertisers.
My thread about the agency that sent girls unshowered to see otehr clients....was vouched for by four or five other posters....
But accoridng to the back channels Fed himself pulled it.
No explanation. Nothing.