Yeah, just like Trump: A liar and a loser. One difference, though, is that Trump has been accused of rape and she hasn't.
Everything about the Republican Party.
- Thread starter sene5hos
- Start date
- Status
Trump, Done with Democracy, Calls on Kari Lake to Be 'Installed' as Arizona's Governor
Former President Donald Trump called for Kari Lake to be "installed" as governor or Arizona despite her losing the election.
www.rollingstone.com
So much for the "law and order" President
I love how they always try to accuse others of being creepy predators.... while in the mean time:
850 active cases of Republican Sexual Predators, Abusers and Enables Pt 1 of 30
850 active cases of Republican Sexual Predators, Abusers and Enables Pt 1 of 30
At some point, people noticed that whatever Republicans were campaigning on/accusing Democrats was the actual opposite of their actions.Trump, Done with Democracy, Calls on Kari Lake to Be 'Installed' as Arizona's Governor
Former President Donald Trump called for Kari Lake to be "installed" as governor or Arizona despite her losing the election.
So much for the "law and order" President
The "law and order" GOP mantra is especially laughable coming from Trump. But in keeping with the theme of GOP campaign/rhetoric is actually projection, guess the last president that campaigned on "law and order?" That would be Richard Nixon--yeah that Richard Nixon
Trump Declared Himself the ‘President of Law and Order.’ Here’s What People Get Wrong About the Origins of That Idea
Elizabeth Hinton, a historian of U.S. inequality, says the focus on Nixon obscures the real Presidential origins of modern "law and order"
Today is election day in Georgia for the 100th Senate siege.At some point, people noticed that whatever Republicans were campaigning on/accusing Democrats was the actual opposite of their actions.
The "law and order" GOP mantra is especially laughable coming from Trump. But in keeping with the theme of GOP campaign/rhetoric is actually projection, guess the last president that campaigned on "law and order?" That would be Richard Nixon--yeah that Richard Nixon
Trump Declared Himself the ‘President of Law and Order.’ Here’s What People Get Wrong About the Origins of That Idea
Elizabeth Hinton, a historian of U.S. inequality, says the focus on Nixon obscures the real Presidential origins of modern "law and order"time.com
Ron de Santis, the possible Republican President candidate expressed his support for Herschel Walker, whose greatest political quality is being a retired football star and supported by Donald Trump !
So go WARNUCK for another BIG slap in the face of this sordid moron....he will do it......
I just saw that WARNUCK won in Georgia against WALKER.
The best thing for Democrats would be that Trump will be the Republican candidate in 2024.
The unelected branch of the Republican party: the Supreme Court
Yesssssss...WARNUCK did it.... ..this should b the ultimate wake up call for the REPUBS......if not they head towards a wall.... que leur a bâti BIG DUMMY ORANGE .
..this should b the ultimate wake up call for the REPUBS......if not they head towards a wall.... que leur a bâti BIG DUMMY ORANGE .
Even if Walker won it wouldn’t of changed the balance in the senate. Remember, the VP would cast a deciding vote in a 50/50 senate. thats why the Republicans didn’t break the bank to get Walker elected. But a good win for Warnuck nonetheless.
Herschel Walker loses runoff election in Georgia
Former Heisman Trophy-winning running back Herschel Walker lost to Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock in a crucial Georgia runoff election Tuesday.
Republican challenger Herschel Walker, the former Heisman Trophy-winning running back, lost to Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock in a Georgia runoff election Tuesday, ensuring Democrats an outright majority in the Senate for the rest of President Joe Biden's term.
Neither reached the general election majority required under state law last month, leading to Tuesday's runoff. Warnock's win gives the Democrats a 51-49 Senate majority, gaining a seat from the current 50-50 split with John Fetterman's victory in Pennsylvania. There will be a divided government, however, with Republicans having narrowly flipped House control.
The Republicans rarely win the popular vote in any modern presidential election. What was it - once in the past three decades? But they have occupied the White House a few times anyway thanks to the inefficient Electoral College system. On those occasions, their main achievements have been starting unjust wars, making the rich richer at the expense of middle class Americans, removing acquired rights, supporting racist actions, stacking the SCOTUS with contemptible rightwing clowns (at least two of whom had been accused of serious sexual wrongdoing), giving pardons to criminals and traitors, telling lies about COVID that undoubtedly caused many unnecessary deaths, causing all sorts of damage that the Democrats subsequently have to correct every time they re-assume their rightful position in power, and - let's not forget - encouraging a violent treasonous coup in a failed attempt to turn the USA into a fascist dictatorship...all the while cozying up to guys like Trump's hero Putin.
The only good thing about the Banana Republicans is that they provide a lot of laughs thanks to key figures like Marjorie Taylor "Peach Tree Dish" Greene, Donald J. "Covfefe" Trump, and the many other dimwitted liars, QAnon cultists and cowardly, hypocritical asskissers in their corrupt party.
Their constant infighting also provides amusement because when they're not telling lies about the Democrats they're busy slamming each other. When they do so, it's like a wrestling match with two bad guys facing each other.
The only good thing about the Banana Republicans is that they provide a lot of laughs thanks to key figures like Marjorie Taylor "Peach Tree Dish" Greene, Donald J. "Covfefe" Trump, and the many other dimwitted liars, QAnon cultists and cowardly, hypocritical asskissers in their corrupt party.
Their constant infighting also provides amusement because when they're not telling lies about the Democrats they're busy slamming each other. When they do so, it's like a wrestling match with two bad guys facing each other.
Get ready for a bumpy ride. Most human societies rarely survive beyond 250 years in their original form, and it looks like America is not going to be the exception.
newrepublic.com
The Republicans in power today have every intention of ending democracy via voter suppression, gerrymandering, and simply abusing their power to overturn election results they don’t like. Three grim scenarios for America’s future cannot be dismissed. The first two put us back in the post-Reconstruction era. The second is a threat we’ve never seen before: the functional end of our democracy for generations. The closest analogy is 1860, with the difference that the South had somehow managed to game the system into overturning the election of Lincoln and installed John Breckinridge as president.
Unless voters wake up—and Democrats wake them up—we’re on the verge of permanent, minoritarian, single-party rule, and few seem to realize what that would look like, much less the consequences. Once we reach that point, there’s a limited number of potential outcomes. This article explores how we might reach each of them, and what they would look like. Spoiler alert: None of them are good.
Preparing for the Worst
Unless voters wake up—and Democrats wake them up—we’re on the verge of permanent, minoritarian, single-party rule.
newrepublic.com
The Republicans in power today have every intention of ending democracy via voter suppression, gerrymandering, and simply abusing their power to overturn election results they don’t like. Three grim scenarios for America’s future cannot be dismissed. The first two put us back in the post-Reconstruction era. The second is a threat we’ve never seen before: the functional end of our democracy for generations. The closest analogy is 1860, with the difference that the South had somehow managed to game the system into overturning the election of Lincoln and installed John Breckinridge as president.
Unless voters wake up—and Democrats wake them up—we’re on the verge of permanent, minoritarian, single-party rule, and few seem to realize what that would look like, much less the consequences. Once we reach that point, there’s a limited number of potential outcomes. This article explores how we might reach each of them, and what they would look like. Spoiler alert: None of them are good.
Last edited:
So true and so troubling. The prognosis for the long-term survival of the US is guarded.Get ready for a bumpy ride. Most human societies rarely survive beyond 250 years in their original form, and America is not going to be the exception.
Preparing for the Worst
Unless voters wake up—and Democrats wake them up—we’re on the verge of permanent, minoritarian, single-party rule.
The Republicans in power today have every intention of ending democracy via voter suppression, gerrymandering, and simply abusing their power to overturn election results they don’t like. Three grim scenarios for America’s future cannot be dismissed. The first two put us back in the post-Reconstruction era. The second is a threat we’ve never seen before: the functional end of our democracy for generations. The closest analogy is 1860, with the difference that the South had somehow managed to game the system into overturning the election of Lincoln and installed John Breckinridge as president.
Unless voters wake up—and Democrats wake them up—we’re on the verge of permanent, minoritarian, single-party rule, and few seem to realize what that would look like, much less the consequences. Once we reach that point, there’s a limited number of potential outcomes. This article explores how we might reach each of them, and what they would look like. Spoiler alert: None of them are good.
Democracy in the USA is hanging by a thread with 70 million people voting for a lying, incompetent, stupid traitor in the last presidential election. Fortunately democracy was saved at least for the time being when the traitor still lost by seven million votes...but it's very scary when QAnon supporters like Marjorie Taylor Greene get re-elected, when the lying, losing traitor still has influence in the GOP, when soulless hypocrites like Lindsay and Ted have ongoing power, when spineless yes-man Pence dreams pf being Pres, when McCarthy will kiss the ass of MTG and others like her so that he can become Speaker, and when vicious, ignorant fools like Jordan and Paul have nothing but revenge on their minds. Then you look at younger Repubs like Boebert, Cawthorn and Hawley...and they're just as disgusting as the corrupt oldtimers. It's pretty sad when Moscow Mitch is one of the BETTER people in the party!
Sondage Wall Street Journal pour la primaire Républicaine....De Santis 52%...Tromp 38%......les carottes sont cuites pour BIG ORANGE DUMMY.
De Santis is also disgusting, just like almost every Republican politician. Obviously Trump is the worst, since De Santis hasn't YET committed treason...but De Santis is potentially more dangerous than Donnie because he's almost as bad and - like almost everyone on the planet - is also a lot more intelligent than Bunker Boy.
With any luck, the lying, ignorant traitor that these unscrupulous clowns have been protecting will be going DOWN...and if there's any justice so will many of them. The GOP has been a wart on America's face for too long and the sooner it vanishes the better it will be for the nation and the world. The Department of Justice now FINALLY has its referrals. I hope Merrick Garland acts quickly.
Purplem, but Mike Pence said prosecuting Trump would be divisive! And he's right! Everyone knows you can't prosecute someone for obvious crimes if it's going to hurt people's feelings.
We should just let people openly commit crimes only if no one will get upset about following the law, but not just any law, but some crazy law/norm that election winners are the ones that have more votes.
We should just let people openly commit crimes only if no one will get upset about following the law, but not just any law, but some crazy law/norm that election winners are the ones that have more votes.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
