.
.
.
It's in Toronto. It'd be interesting to see the police do it in Montréal.
Link to original
Please just discreetly pay your provider up front & don't make them have to ask. xx
Guy fucked around & found out
- Thread starter Anna Bijou
- Start date
- Status
It's in Toronto. It'd be interesting to see the police do it in Montréal.
Link to original
Please just discreetly pay your provider up front & don't make them have to ask. xx
One major problem is that if the customer fails to pay, the agency must handle it. Often, in this industry, events do not lead to police complaints, both for agencies and independent service providers. Street service providers should not be taken lightly as not paying them can lead to severe consequences. They may resort to using weapons or pepper spray, and in the worst-case scenario, you may have to face their pimp. It is better to be cautious and avoid getting into such situations. A majority of these events are not reported to law enforcement.I hold no regard for clients who do not fulfill payment obligations, as it is entirely disrespectful behavior. These individuals should be exposed and be blacklisted everywhere.
Last edited:
It is much more than disrespectful! It's called theft and is also considered a rape.
I believe you may be taking things too far in regards to the topic of rape. It's absolutely not a case of rape. If the earlier article had reported a case of sexual assault, it would have been referenced. Without a doubt, it is an act of stealing.
get your infos right, it is legally considered a rape, not paying the girl eliminates her consent.
How could it be classified as rape? If it were true, then the Durham police would have included it in the article. Both sides came to a mutual agreement regarding the cost of engaging in sexual activities. The sole issue was that the customer failed to honor their agreement. The service was not obliged or coerced into performing tasks against her will. I see no point in engaging in a debate with you as it would be unproductive for me to do so. It is absolutely not a case of sexual assault.
I'm pretty sure rape victims would disagree, as payment is the least of their concerns.
Exactly, and will police do the same if an escort rips off a client? I doubt it.
The comments in that article is lit lmao. No wonder SPs avoid brown men like a plague lol. I am brown so I can I can say this I guess.
Ah it depends...somehow, a professional SW doing her due diligence will still manage to avoid such unwanted encounters unless she was really not lucky / or had no other choice but to let her guard down. There are SWs who meet brown folks and never have any issue because they do..their ... due diligence. It is the same principle as we, their clients: in decades of hobbying, I managed, for the most part, to avoid bad SWs. Why? Because I am very careful and take no risk. I am not adventurous. I stay away from SWs who do not have a good reputation. Now, it is surely harder for some SWs to work that way as they probably have to take risks and find new clients, in some cases. And that is most likely when such unfortunate situations happen. That said, what happened to this SW is unacceptable and this is where a network of SWs is important to any SW as they can share intel about what client is reliable or not. I doubt that poor example of a client (if you can call that a "client") would have found his way among professional SWs relying on networked intel.
Last edited:
There's no consent without money exchange which means that it's a sexual assault...or rape if someone doesn't pay. Reality ain't pretty .
incorrect.
- What if the guy pay and later steal the money, now its ok? or stealing a woman = rape?
- The key here is that she gave her consent before getting paid. If we start mixing real rape (sex without consent) and girls unhappy after sex because they didn't get paid or the guy is not how they expected... we just lighten what rape is and its wrong.
- If an escort would feel raped if she doesn't get paid, then should should ask for the money upfront (she will just get less clients).
- Escorts here complained about "getting stolen", the guy is not accuse of "serial raping" and I don't know of any case in history where an escort that willingly had hex as long as she get paid after... complained of getting rape when she didn't get paid.
In a sudden turn of events, the knowledge of law has become commonplace and individuals have become well-versed in legal matters. This is obvious to everyone, let's be logical. If the service provider was not coerced or compelled to do something she did not want to do, then how can it be considered rape? Ensure your information is accurate as the solution is based on sound reasoning. I have finished responding.
I'm not a lawyer but calling this rape seems absurd. It's theft
All of a sudden, individuals on this platform possess a certain level of legal knowledge and education.I fail to understand why individuals term it as a sexual assault. It is disrespectful to those who have suffered from rape.It’s unquestionably no RAPE. It’s mine blowing that individuals here called it rape.
With all respect ...
Being paid does not = consent.
Take as an example a SW that agrees to meet a John, get's paid and refuses to offer anal (no consent).
If the genius forces anal on her he can, and should, be charged with rape.
Not being paid is not in any way non-consent.
Just take any one-night between 2 consenting adults.
In the OPs cited example and the facts put forth we seem to be looking at theft and not rape.
- Status
Similar threads
