I won't get into this since the last time someone started calling people who don't believe in conspiracy stories 'woke' on here their thread got shut down in less than 24 hrs so all I'll say is that once someone starts using 'woke' like it's derogatory, I know we are not going to have a meaningful or enlightening conversation.There was someone, I won't name him, who wanted ''woke university'' to be over too at the beginning of the 20th century lol. He had the ''woke books'' burned.
Hey and according to some polls the earth is flat, global warming is fake and there are reptilians masquerading as humans.
Those two facts are connected, if you're smart enough you will understand why.
(Oh.. but what do I know? What am I even talking about? I don't like people getting killed and I don't like violence, I am a dumb prostitute. It's naive to think this way, science has proven that for biological reasons my intelligence must be low. I am too sentimental & irrational. it rhymes..)
Ask us anything part 3
- Thread starter LC18
- Start date
I don't know what you're referring to but I'm sure it's not a good idea to get into this, I was going to suggest a wholesome question or topic but that's also not welcome.. so.. have a good night everyone and make sure to write down your dreams
Like I said, it's right there in post 2,906! See below:
Here's an example: there are very few women who study Physics. Why? A student of Gender Studies would say: "That must be because male scientists who have dominated the field since the beginning are sexists!" The reality is more complicated than that. Decades of psychological research have shown that personality traits and certain innate abilities that vary between men and women influence career choices. That's not to say that there are no talented female physicists–there certainly are many! But to answer these types of question, we have to look at group averages. To further illustrate my point: does anyone think that the fact that 80% of clinical psychologists are women is caused by an anti-men bias in the field? Probably not. In fact, numerous studies have shown that women are, on average, more empathetic than men. Empathy is a very important trait to successfully practice psychotherapy in the 21st century. I also don't believe that psychologists are underpaid (current hourly rate of $140-250 (minus expenses, of course))
This should be nothing new. This debate played out in the media and on social media over the past 10 years. The "woke" crowd were excellent at creating a climate of fear and intimidation, and among the very few who dared telling the truth, based on rigorous scientific research, some lost their job (see the "Google letter" for example). Fortunately, the primacy of rational scientific inquiry is being restored.
Last edited:
I look at the breasts. Are they natural (I don't like fake breasts as much)? If they sag a little, that's a bonus. I examine the poses in the photos, considering whether they seem too heavily edited or filtered. Photos that look natural appeal to me more. Sacroiliac dimples and a little extra padding on the stomach (forming a small bump between the navel and the pubis) really turn me on. A photo dressed in a sundress or little black dress and another in beautiful lingerie (lace) where you can see a bit of a nipple... In short, a natural look is what turns me on.
I read the description/ad to get an idea of whether there would be any affinity, but it often doesn't tell me much. I like mentions of what the SP likes, such as: I really like my ass or my breasts, I love feeling a cock grow in my mouth, or I'm the type to take charge. Descriptions are often a list of what the SP does or doesn't do, rather than a description of what she likes most.
I book on the whole package, trying to see if there will be a fit.
Last edited:
