No it's not. It's exclusion based on privacy/discretion reasons. The intent is to not be recognized and outed, not to restrict service based on race.It’s obviously RACISM.
Excluding someone on the basis of their race IS the definition of racism.
No it's not. It's exclusion based on privacy/discretion reasons. The intent is to not be recognized and outed, not to restrict service based on race.It’s obviously RACISM.
Excluding someone on the basis of their race IS the definition of racism.
Here it is again for those who need a reminderRacism
1. prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.
2. the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another.
You are sounding like a rapist.but you do agree these call girls are offering a businesslike service and they are not marrying us for the rest of our lives. Yes not Barber or else.....but i laugh when i say intimate. These women have been "had "by so many men that it is not an intimate act anymore but an act and a job . So comparing these escorts to normal women is not fair...especially when they are taking money and supposed to be offering a service .But i guess they can get away with it because we allow it .
no, sorry you're making no sense, I'm quoting a definition and have otherwise not contributed to the thread.Believing this is racist. I think you are racist. Stop trying to impose your beliefs and definitions on people. Stop trying to tell people they are not allowed to have preferences, sexual or otherwise.
See how that works both ways
But you're not apparently understanding the application of the definition. There is no discrimination or prejudice based on race when persons are excluded solely based on privacy or discretion factors. You cited a definition. The important part is applying it to the facts at hand.no, sorry you're making no sense, I'm quoting a definition and have otherwise not contributed to the thread.
Exactly, they may even be DATING someone from that ethnicity.But they are still fully booked right ? While I understand why it must be infuriating, I think they are in a position to do that. Whether it's because of a past experience, a personal preference or just because it allows them to be more at ease, I think the word racism is badly used here. They might have friends of different ethnicities, heck they might hang out with guys of different ethnicities but in this line of work they are allowed to have some choice of freedom.
Same thing as those who don't do duo or girls. Do you see couple or girls complaining about sexism or ageism ?? The racism card is called upon way too often imo.
Entertaining AF thought!This is the most retarted thread ive ever read lol
Hmmm I thought that was a fair point. Many sex workers dissociate while they are with a client. Whether others are able to work without dissociating, I don’t know and I’m not well-placed to be commenting on that.I can't read past that. This is stupid. Stop reading anti-sexwork books.
But that’s exactly what you are doing no?Stop trying to impose your beliefs and definitions on people.
SO ARE THEY! NO MORE BUSINESS!!!!I'm totally screwed once they start listing "No ugly men" as a restriction...
Maybe she weighed 120lbs and her bed was break-tested for max 300 lbs (from IKEA) !I remember years ago I saw an SP who had a 180 pound weight restriction. At the time, I weighed 175 and could see her; now I am well over 180 and would fail the weight restriction. Overfiend and his fellow protectors of the "entitlement to service" would say she was prejudiced against fat men. Racist against the obese.
Nahhh he was making a pointBut that’s exactly what you are doing no?
seems like you cant even make a point lolIn a sense I guess I am.
Some people are saying you aren't allowed to say no and I am saying the opposite
Embarrassingly older? Is 55 old for you?
Some may be racist, but you are ageist.
Here’s my point: .Nahhh he was making a point
Here it is again for those who need a reminder
These women have been "had "by so many men that it is not an intimate act anymore but an act and a job .
She weighed more like 95-100 pounds- small and petiteMaybe she weighed 120lbs and her bed was break-tested for max 300 lbs (from IKEA) !
With that i agree , time to unwatchHere’s my point: .
I won’t repeat myself!
I am sure you have, who you decide to see is your business, not mine.I'm sorry but I've seen a lot of vile cheap and violent white men in my life lol should I start not seeing them?
Sorry but I strongly disagree with your interpretation of racism. I have a preference for caucasian brunette not so much toward blonde. A preference is just that... a preference. Racism if when you deny a specific race RIGHTS that are guarantee to others. Black being denied to go at certain hotels or restaurants in the USA in the sixties is a real exemple. Jackie Robinson all time star baseball player could not go with his team at certain places. Stereotypes has nothing to do with racism. Racism is about race. Intimate relations is a personal choice nothing to do with racism.Basing your preferences on stereotypes created by the society is racism but I don’t think we’re quite ready for that conversation on merb.





