Oh yeah,
No one understands the french culture more than i do.
When have you ever shown any interest in it. Your absence in previous French language threads speaks volumes.
Rumples & Merlot THINK they understand the french culture because they sometimes come to Mtl to bang a few escorts who happen to speak french. But do they speak french with the escorts they see? No!!!!!!!!
This is as ignorant and idiotically presumptuous as it gets. I thank God for the blessing of never meeting you, and so in that case your post is just a mean-spirited lie. My French is very marginally passable, but I have spent dozens of hours making every effort to write in French on this board for several years as everyone knows. I may not be too successful, but I do it and I've made much more effort to show respect to the French speakers here than you ever considered. I confirm my hotel reservations on the phone and make requests about the rooms in French, I deal with the clerks and maids often in French, I order breakfast, lunch, and dinner and drinks and try to converse briefly with the restaurant staff in French. I shop at the SAQs or depanneurs in French, get information from cabbies, bus drivers, and locals in French, and I fawn over the escorts IN FRENCH. :thumb: What does a pompous bitter man know about it.
There is no way that two Americans will ever be able to fully grasp the french culture, nor will they ever be considered a part of it. They will always be looked upon as outsiders, no matter how hard they try to fit in.
This would include EB and your other pals who have never attempted a glimmer of French ever yet insert their opinions nonetheless.
What are you talking about? "The abuses" of Law 101 and "it's over compensation towards French"? The entire premise of the law is geared towards French first and every other language second. The entire law is abusive and "over compensation" and such a law is discriminatory by it's very nature.
Every state in the U.S. has mandatory education in English prescribed by specific regulations. Depending on the state other languages such as French, Spanish, Latin, German, etc are offered as a second language. There is nothing new about this situation despite the presence of large minorities. There is nothing wrong with prescribing the learning of a language that is dominate among the majority of the population. Where Law 101 becomes abusive is in blocking the learning of other languages.
Do you support public schools that support the cultures and languages of all minorities in Canada whether they are Spanish, German, Italian, Russian, Hebrew, Norwegian, Chinese, Hindi, Arabic, Lingala, Berber, Swahili, and so on, or just the English. If it's just the latter then theoretically you are being discriminatory if you don't support public education for all languages. That's a pretty impossible situation if you carry out your anti-discrimination views with the kind of zealous super-equity rights you keep suggesting for your idyllic...
"I will never change my view that all citizens in Canada should have equal access to all publicly funded institutions no matter what language they speak" paradise. It creates quite a nation of Babel. Do you think the English and French will be agreeable to funding that???
My slant on the language laws was for fairly defined and regulated bilingual balance that recognizes the cultural majority as well as the significant minority. However, rationally and practically I wouldn't support the public funding of every language dozens of minorities represent. No nation or state in it's right mind would do that.
Oh...and now the PQ are saying that there are not enough people in Montreal with French as a mother tongue ...Subsidized housing for les Pur Laine? Tax breaks based on language heritage? Free parking spots? How about new immigration rules? You really gotta love it.
You keep harping on your fears and xenophobic demons. What about a practical workable defined solution, other than tearing up 101, that would resolve the issues for both sides. ANYTHING THERE?
Cheers,
Merlot