Should the legal age for SPs be increased to 21 years old?
- Thread starter General Gonad
- Start date
- Status
shijak said:
A noble thought: if every one on this board asked agency owners to hire only 21 year olds, what do you think they would do? Probably nothing but just like drugs, if you do not curb the demand, you're not going to curb the supply.
GG
Special K said:GG,
I'd be very interested to hear what the very reputable
SK,
I am not saying that Mark is right and John is wrong. I am not taking sides in their dispute. But I do believe Mark when he tells me that she is not able to handle this line of work any longer and tries to escape her problems in the worst possible way. That much I believe, which is why I wouldn't recommend her no matter which agency she ends up working with.
This young lady needs to go back and finish high school. She is smart and has the potential to exceed as long as she gets on the right path and stays away from SPing.
GG
General Gonad said:
Yea,
He`s so concerned for her well being that he just had to advertise that she`s working tonight https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=18923
I wish I was a fly in the phone line when you two spoke just to hear for myself the utter BS that he was spinning for ya.
SK
M-G said:
Special K said:Yea,
He`s so concerned for her well being that he just had to advertise that she`s working tonight https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=18923
I wish I was a fly in the phone line when you two spoke just to hear for myself the utter BS that he was spinning for ya.
SK
Ok, regardless of whether or not he`s bullshitting me, I am still not recommending her no matter which agency she is working with.
GG
SMACK APPEAL said:
SA,
You're right and I apologize. Now I want to take a break from posting...for this afternoon at least.
GG
SMACK APPEAL said:
This is so funny. LMAO! The irony is that GG, like in the case of Samantha, would gladly recommend "your 18-year old" daugther to other hobbyists. Yeah! that is exactly how he shows respect to the SP. Recommending a "kid" (he knew she was 18 when he highly recommended her) to the Merb hobbyists, not too puritan, is he?
Unless he changes the following "recommendation", whatever he says elsewhere would simply be BS. How can he say that he would not recommend her when he already did exactly that: Recommend her. People who will do a search on "Samantha" will see this recommendation and not the debate in this "legal-age-21" thread.
General Gonad said:There is something in the name Samantha that exudes sexual energy. This young lady has that and a lot more. She is very sweet and easy-going. She is, however, a little younger than what I typically like (18 years old), but I would recommend her in a flash to anyone that loves hot and sexy brunettes. She is very nice and warm and provides excellent GFE service.
I am glad Samantha came back to Eleganza. She is an incredible young lady in terms of sexual energy but she is young. I had no problems conversing with her in French (she also speaks English) but I think she will mature more in her twenties and become one hot woman. I want her to eventually go back to school and forget this hobby. She has a plan and I hope she sticks to it.
But as long as she is with Eleganza, let's take care of this babe and show her how a real VIP is treated.
GG
Last edited:
Maxima said:
Maxima,
You're obviously an ***** for posting this. Read post # 132 and ****** (if you need a translation of this acronym, PM me).
I do not recommend her no matter which agency she ends up with; I want her to get the hell out of SPing and go back to finish school.GG
P.S. I will delete my thread on Samantha and I suggest you delete your post.
Last edited by a moderator:
General Gonad said:Maxima,
You're obviously an ****** for posting this. Read post # 132 and ***** (if you need a translation of this acronym, PM me).
GG
LMAO. See, I told you, you are way smarter than me.
With all due respect, please tell me:
On Aug 25 at 8:05 pm: did you or did you not recommend Samantha?
On Aug 25 at 8:05 pm: did you or did you not know about her age (18)?
So can I conclude that On Aug 25 at 8:05 pm, you did recommend an 18 year old SP to other hobbyists?
Is it not hypocritical for a guy who did recommend a kid and then go on and want to "raise" the Sping age to 21?
Read my previous post again when you calm down a bit.
Last edited by a moderator:
So I made a mistake in my initial review?!?
Hey, I had sex with an 18 year old and I thought she was sexy but young and she definetely had a lot of things on her mind. Did I recommend her? Yes. Was it a mistake on my part? Hell yes. She has way too many things on her mind right now to be SPing. I deleted my review and asked the Mods to do the same on the other review board.
The best thing we can do for this young lady is leave her alone and let her get back to finishing high school.
GG
P.S. Do I still believe it's better to pressure owners to hire 21 year old SPs? Yes, now more than ever.
Maxima said:
Hey, I had sex with an 18 year old and I thought she was sexy but young and she definetely had a lot of things on her mind. Did I recommend her? Yes. Was it a mistake on my part? Hell yes. She has way too many things on her mind right now to be SPing. I deleted my review and asked the Mods to do the same on the other review board.
The best thing we can do for this young lady is leave her alone and let her get back to finishing high school.
GG
P.S. Do I still believe it's better to pressure owners to hire 21 year old SPs? Yes, now more than ever.
Wow... I guess I didn't know that..... time for me learn English, eh?General Gonad said:
GG, what is your real reason for starting this? come on, don't give that non-sense of Samantha's age BS. If she was working at an agency at that time... and you question her age and that agency..... now, then according to what you wrote after your phone conversation, apparently another agency owner was a BF of Samantha. Wow.. then is it possible that Samantha was also too young for that guy? but you have no problem with that issue?
GG,
I must admit that like Orallover and Maxima, I was very puzzled by you starting this thread. You posted a glowing review of Samantha, an 18 year old SP, and later recanted that review in its entirety. Then you start this thread, which seems somehow linked to Samantha, and bash all hobbyists who want to see SPs under age 21, although 24-48 hours earlier, you glowingly reviewed an 18 year old SP you had seen.
Irrespective of what you may have learned (or not) behind the scenes, this does not add up and certainly appears hypocritical.
I am someone who has deleted my fair share of posts but I don't recall ever deleting a review I wrote of an SP, or recanting a recommendation on an SP. I am not sure this episode bodes well for your credibility. As with your retirements which lasted 11 minutes, putting up and then swiftly and aggressively recanting a glowing review of SP has left many questioning your motives here. At best, you seem exceedingly mercurial in your posting.
I will say that you do have a penchant or talent for putting up posts and spawning posts on interesting issues, but you may want to wait like a week before you post reviews in the future. This way you give yourself time to recant before posting, which would tend to save possible wear and tear on your Board credibility.
I must admit that like Orallover and Maxima, I was very puzzled by you starting this thread. You posted a glowing review of Samantha, an 18 year old SP, and later recanted that review in its entirety. Then you start this thread, which seems somehow linked to Samantha, and bash all hobbyists who want to see SPs under age 21, although 24-48 hours earlier, you glowingly reviewed an 18 year old SP you had seen.
Irrespective of what you may have learned (or not) behind the scenes, this does not add up and certainly appears hypocritical.
I am someone who has deleted my fair share of posts but I don't recall ever deleting a review I wrote of an SP, or recanting a recommendation on an SP. I am not sure this episode bodes well for your credibility. As with your retirements which lasted 11 minutes, putting up and then swiftly and aggressively recanting a glowing review of SP has left many questioning your motives here. At best, you seem exceedingly mercurial in your posting.
I will say that you do have a penchant or talent for putting up posts and spawning posts on interesting issues, but you may want to wait like a week before you post reviews in the future. This way you give yourself time to recant before posting, which would tend to save possible wear and tear on your Board credibility.
Last edited:
For those who think the legal age for sps should be 21.......shouldn't the same theory be applied for johns??
Personally, i think anyone under 30 shouldn't be allowed to see sps. But am i correct? Who cares.....the matter is entirely out of my hands. However, i am entitled to an opinion.
As for the legal age for sps, i don't really have an opinion on it. Everyone has made valid points. However, let's say that the age is brought up to 21. You'll then have people saying that the legal age for sps should be brought up to 25 and a whole bunch of statements supporting this will be posted and there will be no end to it. Whatever we think is, in the end, totally irrelevant. We are not lawmakers. But one thing many of us are....opinionated.
Personally, i think anyone under 30 shouldn't be allowed to see sps. But am i correct? Who cares.....the matter is entirely out of my hands. However, i am entitled to an opinion.
As for the legal age for sps, i don't really have an opinion on it. Everyone has made valid points. However, let's say that the age is brought up to 21. You'll then have people saying that the legal age for sps should be brought up to 25 and a whole bunch of statements supporting this will be posted and there will be no end to it. Whatever we think is, in the end, totally irrelevant. We are not lawmakers. But one thing many of us are....opinionated.
Do we invite them to the bed or the "couch".
Hello all,
Let's all presume that the idea of raising the legal age for an SP to 21 is a good one at it's been done. Okay great. We have saved the 18-21 years olds from the damaging degenerative influence of being an SP, and this group can now deal with the pressures and inadequacies they already have. We have helped perform a great service by promoting this new law and they have more time to mature. Can we just be hobbyists now?
Considering the moral righteousness of our "cause" is our conscience supposed to stop at age 21? We all know that age often has nothing to do with maturity and their are plenty of so-called adults who are very immature, as this board has too often proven. Are we now supposed to be good psycho analyst hobbyists for those above 21? When we meet the allegedly mature ladies over 21 do we invite them in for a blissful intimate time or do we invite them to the psychology couch and start looking for any signs of cracks? When is it okay to just be a hobbyist again?
This thread has created some interesting discussion. There are many valid reasons for raising the age to 21, though I would say 25 is more effective because by that time most have started setting up a home and creating a family and gotten real about the world because of it. But despite the moral consciences within us that has spurred this thread...we are just hobbyists after all. Those who want to pay 300, 400, or 500 to psycho analyze SPs can do so. I will try to be kind, respectful, and sensitive so I don't make things any worse for her than they may be already. AND..I will try to make it fun for both of us instead of doing social work in such a flagrantly hypocritcal situation. Be kind...that's plenty.
Best regards,
Korbel
Hello all,
Let's all presume that the idea of raising the legal age for an SP to 21 is a good one at it's been done. Okay great. We have saved the 18-21 years olds from the damaging degenerative influence of being an SP, and this group can now deal with the pressures and inadequacies they already have. We have helped perform a great service by promoting this new law and they have more time to mature. Can we just be hobbyists now?
Considering the moral righteousness of our "cause" is our conscience supposed to stop at age 21? We all know that age often has nothing to do with maturity and their are plenty of so-called adults who are very immature, as this board has too often proven. Are we now supposed to be good psycho analyst hobbyists for those above 21? When we meet the allegedly mature ladies over 21 do we invite them in for a blissful intimate time or do we invite them to the psychology couch and start looking for any signs of cracks? When is it okay to just be a hobbyist again?
This thread has created some interesting discussion. There are many valid reasons for raising the age to 21, though I would say 25 is more effective because by that time most have started setting up a home and creating a family and gotten real about the world because of it. But despite the moral consciences within us that has spurred this thread...we are just hobbyists after all. Those who want to pay 300, 400, or 500 to psycho analyze SPs can do so. I will try to be kind, respectful, and sensitive so I don't make things any worse for her than they may be already. AND..I will try to make it fun for both of us instead of doing social work in such a flagrantly hypocritcal situation. Be kind...that's plenty.
Best regards,
Korbel
Hmmm... after going thru this thread here is a lesson to be learned..
ALWAYS SAY LESS THAN NECESSARY.
When trying to impress people with words, the more you say, the more common you appear, and the less in control. The truly powerful knows this and they impress and intimidate by saying less. The more you say, the more likely you are to say something foolish!
Remember the story of Gneaus Marcius and you all will be a wiser individual.
ALWAYS SAY LESS THAN NECESSARY.
When trying to impress people with words, the more you say, the more common you appear, and the less in control. The truly powerful knows this and they impress and intimidate by saying less. The more you say, the more likely you are to say something foolish!
Remember the story of Gneaus Marcius and you all will be a wiser individual.
To K
Hello,
Thanks Kaempferrand...for being much, much..."LESS"...than the rest.
regards,
Korbel
Hello,
Thanks Kaempferrand...for being much, much..."LESS"...than the rest.
regards,
Korbel
Last edited:
Karma said:
Well said, as usual. We finally got the astute perspective of the under 21 SP, who has no better spokesperson than Karma.
OK... one small problem, spidie.... you said stop being egoistic.... and bring the subject of having sex with 18 years old girls.... etc...spiderman05 said:This gives the topic a whole new dimension. I am just shocked to hear this coming from a provider
Stop being so self-centered for a second, and stop fearing about not being able to have sex with young girls (that could be as well be your daughters) and think about them as being human beings. If this community is about having sex with minors or next to minor girls then I don't want to be part of it.
PS. Feel free to flame à volonté, I do not care.
PPS. KF your words are full of wisdom.
but, but... you go to strip clubs and watch some of these girls being naked and their bodies... and yes, some of these girls are 18 years old or next to 18 years old...
- Status
Similar threads
