Montreal Escorts

Trumped

Status
Not open for further replies.

Doc Holliday

Staying hard
Sep 27, 2003
19,770
1,274
113
Canada
Hilary is able to outspend Trump almost 42-1 with the funds on hand, and that kind of financial playing field does not bode well for the Donald:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/20/politics/republicans-cash-crunch-donald-trump/index.html

Running a campaign on the cheap isn't going to work.

Clinton burying Trump: $42 million to $1.3 million in campaign fundraising.

Trump's campaign (or lack of it) is an absolute disaster. I'll go as far as saying that it's likely the most disasterous presidential campaign in the history of the country! What a mess!! Honestly, has there ever been a presidential candidate with such unfavorable numbers among potential voters??

And a recent poll shows that 56% of potential voters would be embarrassed to have Donald Trump as their president. One recent insider referred to his campaign as a 'dumpster on fire' and added that if he can't run a presidential campaign, how can he be expected to run a country and its economy?

I can't wait for the GOP convention!!! We need a few laughs right now!!! :lol: :lol:
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
20,352
3,263
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I can't wait for the GOP convention!!! We need a few laughs right now!!! :lol: :lol:

My father mentioned to me the historical perspective and precedent of the 1952 Republican Convention. At the 1952 Republican Convention, Taft was the presumptive nominee. He was a conservative bedrock Midwestern Republican. The then powerful liberal wing of the Republican Party, which I think was led by Dewey, orchestrated a coup in which Dwight Eisenhower was nominated. Eisenhower was a beloved war hero and according to political historians, a very good politician who worked both sides of the Republican Party effectively. People liked him and were able to work with him.

My father has noted the possibility that a similar coup could be staged. He also noted, however, that there is no Eisenhower lurking in the background, just a cadre of knuckleheads. My father said all of this as a lifelong Republican and staunch observer of the Republican Party. The only time he has not voted Republican since 1956 was Obama in 2008, which he later deeply regretted. He had watched the 1952 Republican Convention as a star struck teenager, and later became the President of the Young Replublicans at the university he attended. Eisenhower and Nixon remain his favorite Republicans.

I unlike my father am a lifelong independent and do not believe in affiliations with political parties. I believe we should have a third party to put an end to the partisan politics and bullshit that has ruined political decision making in Congress.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
Since you used my quote very inaccurately I'll clarify what I meant.

One is irrationally out of control. He has all the negative traits making him unfit for office, and he's dangerous. The other has some questionable history and legality issues but it's unlikely there's anything to bring charges on or to disqualify her from office. She is a typical politician, nothing worse.

Since yours facts are wrong, I will clarify what the truth is.

Hillary is a Criminal yet to be tried and when she is tried (unless AG Lynch is truly a Corrupt Hack), it will be an open and shut case.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
Hilary is able to outspend Trump almost 42-1 with the funds on hand, and that kind of financial playing field does not bode well for the Donald:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/20/politics/republicans-cash-crunch-donald-trump/index.html

Running a campaign on the cheap isn't going to work.

CNN (Communist News Network) isn't the best source in these matters.

Billionaire Sheldon Adelson has pledged to donate $100 Million to Trump's campaign, so Trump will end up much more than $1.3 million.

I suspect that a lot HRC's $$$ is coming from Clinton Foundation Donors in order to cover up their donations so that Trump won't be elected. But when after is elected ... all that corruption will be uncovered.
 

Doc Holliday

Staying hard
Sep 27, 2003
19,770
1,274
113
Canada
I unlike my father am a lifelong independent and do not believe in affiliations with political parties. I believe we should have a third party to put an end to the partisan politics and bullshit that has ruined political decision making in Congress.

I totally agree with you. As long as there's one party constantly refusing to dance with the other party in a two-party system, nothing gets done. All you get is gridlock. A third-party alternative would give the political process a chance to work.
 

Doc Holliday

Staying hard
Sep 27, 2003
19,770
1,274
113
Canada
Since yours facts are wrong, I will clarify what the truth is.

Hillary is a Criminal yet to be tried and when she is tried (unless AG Lynch is truly a Corrupt Hack), it will be an open and shut case.

CNN (Communist News Network) isn't the best source in these matters.

Billionaire Sheldon Adelson has pledged to donate $100 Million to Trump's campaign, so Trump will end up much more than $1.3 million.

I suspect that a lot HRC's $$$ is coming from Clinton Foundation Donors in order to cover up their donations so that Trump won't be elected. But when after is elected ... all that corruption will be uncovered.


Man, you're delusional my little buddy!! You crack me up!!! Keep it up!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Doc Holliday

Staying hard
Sep 27, 2003
19,770
1,274
113
Canada
A delegate revolt has become Republicans’ only option

by Michael Gerson, The Washington Post


When it comes to the chaotic, flailing, floundering Trump campaign, many senior Republicans are in a state of panic. Will this become a state of revolt?

“If the next few weeks are anything like the last two,” a senior GOP official told me, “anything could happen at the convention.” Donald Trump’s response to the Orlando attack — encouraging religious bigotry and implying that President Obama might be a secret jihadist — confirmed the worst Republican fear: that Trump will remain Trump.

With this recognition has come the realization that Trump has wasted the seven weeks since becoming the presumptive nominee — a period in which Democrats were divided and vulnerable. How did he fill the vacant air? He raised the possibility that Ted Cruz’s father might be implicated in the assassination of JFK; that Hillary Clinton might have been involved in the death of Vince Foster; that a federal judge, presiding over a case against Trump University, should be disqualified by his ethnicity; and that American soldiers in Iraq were living large off larceny.

By the end of this string of statements, one of Trump’s strongest congressional proxies, Rep. Duncan Hunter (Calif.), was reduced to arguing: “I think what he says and what he’ll do are two different things.” Republicans, in essence, should be reassured by their nominee’s duplicity.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) have been willing to criticize Trump but not to un-endorse him. Practically, this means that nothing — nothing — Trump says could forfeit their support. The presumptive nominee has already raised the prospect that his opponent is a murderer and that the president is a traitor. Not, evidently, sufficient provocations. Ryan and McConnell have decided that in order to remain leaders they must avoid providing leadership.

But what might change things in the GOP is the political disaster that now appears in the offing. Beneath Trump’s historically low approval ratings — 29 percent in a recent Post/ABC News survey — is an even more disturbing development. After securing the nomination, Trump’s support among Republicans rose, in many polls, to the mid-80s — not spectacularly good but an indication that the GOP was rallying. In recent polls, Trump’s Republican support has dropped to between 70 and 80 percent. Along this trend, a decisive Democratic victory might sweep away the House and Senate. If Republican politicians begin to see this dynamic in their own polling, many will suddenly rediscover their consciences and abandon Trump.

Trump’s whole campaign now consists of a pathetic irony. He ran attacking the Republican “establishment” at every turn. Now, since he has neglected to construct his own national campaign, he is completely dependent on the “establishment” to provide his political ground game. First he vilifies the GOP, then he complains that it lacks enthusiasm for his cause.

Republican convention delegates are sophisticated enough to see what is happening. The Trump campaign claims to be lean; in most of the country, including the battleground states, it is nonexistent. Trump offers his leadership as the solution to every problem yet presides over a campaign organization that is a squabbling, paralyzed amateur hour. Delegates know that even if Trump can boost his poll numbers, he cannot magically create a viable, national campaign structure.

If a revolt emerges, it will happen first in the GOP convention rules committee — which meets a week before the convention and is stacked with officials more loyal to the party than to Trump. The simplest move would be to require a supermajority to select a nominee — an approach taken by some Republican state conventions in order to avoid the choice of badly wounded candidates. The goal should be a truly open convention, which does not choose anyone Trump has already beaten

Trump’s response to his swift political decline has been to continue his primary campaign — accusing Jeb Bush of suddenly recovering the energy to plot against him. This comfortable attack makes sense, given that Trump has succeeded by appealing to a niche market that is impressed by his instinctive nativism and Kardashian-like celebrity. So far, the niche candidate has failed to make the transition to a national message. And given the adoration and enthusiasm of his crowds (one recently chanting: “Build a wall and kill them all!”), Trump has no emotional motivation to change direction, whatever the polls might say.

A delegate revolt would be a messy spectacle, with little hope of succeeding unless Ryan and Reince Priebus eventually break with Trump. But it is now the only option consistent with Republican interests and honor.


A delate revolt has become GOP's only option
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
Man, you're delusional my little buddy!! You crack me up!!! Keep it up!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

You have an odd sense of humor but then again you're a bona fide Leftist where Up is really Down and Down is really Up.
 

Doc Holliday

Staying hard
Sep 27, 2003
19,770
1,274
113
Canada
You have an odd sense of humor but then again you're a bona fide Leftist where Up is really Down and Down is really Up.

I love it!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'm not really a leftist, though. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I'm actually a realist. Not someone who spends his entire life watching Faux News twenty-four hours a day while living in the right's GOP bubble. :D

But don't let this discourage you. I love reading whatever you write & again, i love it!! Keep it up!! :bounce:

Drumph, Drumph, Drumph!!! :thumb:
 

Doc Holliday

Staying hard
Sep 27, 2003
19,770
1,274
113
Canada
CNN is now running with the story that Lewandowski's rumored attempts at planting negative stories in the press about Trump's son-in-law is why he got fired (according to "multiple sources")

I heard about this yesterday morning. That was the final straw. Trump's son-in-law is a brilliant man according to many sources and he's recently been writing some of his speeches (which Trump reads off a teleprompter).

I must admit that i kind of feel for the Trump children. Especially Ivanka, whom i find brilliant. Their father has been an embarrassment to the family name throughout his political campaign. It's entirely possible that Corey Lewandowski may be one of several individuals who may or may not have poisoned his mind during the primaries and encouraged to say all the disgusting things he's said. And now it's backfired. Terribly.
 

Passionné

New Member
May 14, 2016
763
0
0
On CNN this morning I caught an interview with a conservative Republican (don't remember her name) who was being asked about the firing of Trump's campaign manager Lewandowski. She said this will not change anything. Trump is who he is. He speaks totally off the cuff and no one puts words in his mouth. Whatever is wrong with his campaign is because Trump is Trump. He's self-destructive no matter who the campaign manager is.

Here's an extremely telling example. As a father there are some things that never get said, even thought. Not for the Donald though. In an interview with Rolling Stone magazine he was asked about his daughter Ivanka. Trump responded: “Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t happily married and, ya know, her father . . . ”

In 2006 in an interview with The View, Trump said about Ivanka: "
You know who’s one of the great beauties of the world, according to everybody? And I helped create her. Ivanka. My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body. She made a lot money as a model—a tremendous amount.”

When asked about the possibility of Ivanka posing for Playboy Trump further said: "
“It would be really disappointing — not really — but it would depend on what’s inside the magazine. I don’t think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”

If you aren't creeped out yet play the second link and hear the Donald compare his second wife's breasts to how his 1 year old baby Ivanka might compare in the future.


http://www.mediaite.com/online/donald-trump-wont-stop-joking-about-banging-his-daughter/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...1-year-old-daughter-breasts-article-1.2591961

Now of the above was setup by his now fired campaign manager Lewandowski. It's all unfiltered Trump with no idea how to self-edit his thoughts or his mouth, not caring to, and having no idea he's being creepy because that's who he is. An out of control vulgar trash-monger.

Maybe someone will blame that on the left too.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
Maybe someone will blame that on the left too.

No, I don't believe in placing blame where no blame is warranted.

However, I do blame the Left for nominating and continuing to a shameless Law Breaker named Hillary Clinton.

She needs to be prosecuted and put in jail.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
I love it!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'm not really a leftist, though. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I'm actually a realist. Not someone who spends his entire life watching Faux News twenty-four hours a day while living in the right's GOP bubble. :D

But don't let this discourage you. I love reading whatever you write & again, i love it!! Keep it up!! :bounce:

Drumph, Drumph, Drumph!!! :thumb:

No, you're a Leftist, true and through. How do I know? If you were a realist like you say you are, you wouldn't be cheering the Left nor would you use Leftist code names like Faux News.

You really don't understand the American Principle of Freedom or our system how it was set up in the Constitution or you would not be trashing it in these threads all the time.

The Bubble exists on the Left (like the one you live in) and the pain is shared by everyone, e.g. Venezuela, which was once a fairly well off society but people are starving to death there. That's the system you praise.
 

Mistral

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2006
524
382
63
No, I don't believe in placing blame where no blame is warranted.

However, I do blame the Left for nominating and continuing to a shameless Law Breaker named Hillary Clinton.

She needs to be prosecuted and put in jail.

blah, blah blah

So focused on repeating his smears for the umpteenth time, he can't even form a proper sentence.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
blah, blah blah

So focused on repeating his smears for the umpteenth time, he can't even form a proper sentence.

I see you don't come around here much. 52 posts in 10 years and always in a political thread .... hmm. Next you'll be posting about the Bawstin Roid Sox.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,076
4,011
113
No, you're a Leftist, true and through. How do I know? If you were a realist like you say you are, you wouldn't be cheering the Left nor would you use Leftist code names like Faux News.

You really don't understand the American Principle of Freedom or our system how it was set up in the Constitution or you would not be trashing it in these threads all the time.

The Bubble exists on the Left (like the one you live in) and the pain is shared by everyone, e.g. Venezuela, which was once a fairly well off society but people are starving to death there. That's the system you praise.

So what if he is a leftist. You are a rightist :blah: Having said that it seems you always get things backwards. You are right the American system was based on freedom... Not being oppressed and controlled by corporations. And there you always go again talking about Venezuela. Have you heard about Iceland? Ireland? Finland? Switzerland? The Netherlands? I guess not. These countries bring the best of socialism and capitalism together. These countries have been consistently voted the best countries to live in. Iceland and Ireland are among the most economically prospering countries with great wealth equality unlike the US. Iceland threw its criminal bankers in jail while the US protects them. Is it not common in New York City for many people to be sharing the same apartment? You only want to spread your rightist propaganda. Here let me bring the worst of Capitalism. BTW Capitalism has starved more people then any communist country ever has. India is pure Capitalistic... A huge portion of the people there are poor and cannot get access to education. The country is very corrupt and everything there goes by bribes. Even in school one has to offer a bribe. China is pure Capitalistic this is why employees are paid so little. Oh yes and Africa, a continent with virtually all the resources it takes for development, is the worst hit by hunger, starvation, armed conflicts, instability, displacement and abject poverty. It has zero socialist policies. This is mainly because of the system which encourages capital accumulation and profit-seeking. The cumulative effect is flagrant corruption, deprivation, wastage and impoverishment which intensifies underdevelopment. Capitalism and imperialism are the major cause of the current underdevelopment in Africa. So this is what you want? How about you show the whole picture instead of posting partial facts to spread your non-sense rightist propaganda to make rightist look good. You probably label me as a leftist also but I am not communist. I am a mixture of libertarian and socialism. I am for the proliferate to have their freedom and for all to have equal access to resources and to be free from being exploited by the rich. In short a much more equitable society with moderated classes and moderated distribution of wealth. For example there should be a maximum wage. In one word I am for mediocrity. This is my beliefs and where I stand. I cannot really call myself a leftist or a rightist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts