Did you read my posts re the two primary people you cited: Jennifer Marohasy and Ivar Giaever? They are both funded by Big Energy and/or Big Tobacco.
It must sound disappointing to you, but shooting at moving targets is not my favorite sport. I never mentioned Jennifer Marohasy as a scientist, let alone a scientist disputing climate theories. I cited her blog post to get a list of scientists who do dispute it. Probably this distinction is too subtle for you, I get it. Life is tough.
You never presented any evidence that Ivar Giaever is "
on the payroll of the Republican Party or Big Energy". You did, however, repeat an old (and many times debunked) lie that he is somehow connected to the "Big Tobacco". We have indeed established that he might have had an ashtray on his desk at some point.
And speaking of science and scientific methods (thank you again for the eloquent soliloquy, however misplaced!): have you by any chance heard of this pesky thing called "logic"? You made the sweeping accusation that "
The only scientists who dispute it are on the payroll of the Republican Party or Big Energy". Even if you had presented any damning evidence of Ivar Giaever's sins (which you obviously failed to do), would that have proved your blanket accusation that
all skeptics are guilty of venality? I don't think so, but again, that might be too subtle for you.
If you had any evidence to back up your blatantly false smear, you would have presented at least part of it by now. It is perfectly clear that you have none.