That's the difference between a true hockey fan and most Leaf fans here.
Just to be specific: In the above sentence, "most" is defined as "2 out of 3" (which, as Meat Loaf will tell you, "ain't bad").
That's the difference between a true hockey fan and most Leaf fans here.
Well, from what i saw, it was a clean check with the shoulder and therefore not a penalty. Both referees seem to have had the same opinion as i had. Just because a player has his back turned to the play doesn't mean that he can't be touched.
It's quite obvious that both you guys are biased against the Leafs (and one of you is a Bruins fan on top of that), so it's not surprising that you are both blinded from the truth. Had the teams been reversed, you would have a totally different opinion.
No foul, no penalty.
...please tell us why the referees wouldn't have called a penalty on Phaneuf if indeed there was a penalty to be called?
Guess the league is biased against the Leaf's as well. Phaneuf hearing tomorrow.
Although it was a good no-call by the two referees on that particular play, the NHL will probably suspend Phaneuf for 1-2 games just to save face & get the complainers off its back.
Although it was a good no-call by the two referees on that particular play, the NHL will probably suspend Phaneuf for 1-2 games just to save face & get the complainers off its back.
The only point I agree with you on is that Phaneuf will probably get off easy with only 2 games.
And if anything, it will be bonus for his team to NOT have him in the lineup. They may even win more than 1 in a row.
It was NOT "a good no-call". It CLEARLY should have been called, as all the NON-BIASED posters here said even BEFORE the NHL correctly announced that there would be a hearing. The referees committed HUMAN ERROR, as SK and I correctly pointed out BEFORE the NHL's announcement.
We should find out Shaun Thornton's suspension on Friday. My guess is that since he's never been suspended in the past & is very well-respected among his peers for the role that he plays (successfully, i may add), he will likely get only 8-10 games, probably 10.
And who's to say that you guys thinking a penalty should have been called is not HUMAN ERROR on your part?
By the way, my buddy SK is a Bruins fan, so it's quite obvious why he'd have a bias view of the play.
What Miller did is often seen in junior hockey where players turn their backs to the play in the last seconds hoping to get hit from behind in order to draw a penalty. Silly you!
Not exactly admirable or courageous actions by these two highly-paid Leafs. Bravo to Shanny for clamping down on this unacceptable behavior!
but for Ranger fans, i hope he takes the path of Marty Brodeur and not a Rick DiPietro for example